C&C 37 vs Santana 37
How do the C&C 37 and Santana 37 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 37 | C&C 37 | Santana 37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.6 ft11.45 m | 37.7 ft11.48 m |
| Waterline length | 28.8 ft8.76 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Beam | 11.7 ft3.56 m | 11.7 ft3.56 m |
| Draft | 6.7 ft2.04 m | 5.6 ft1.70 m |
| Displacement | 14,300 lb6,486 kg | 15,000 lb6,804 kg |
| Ballast | 6,000 lb2,722 kg | 6,600 lb2,994 kg |
| Sail area | 670 ft²62.2 m² | 678 ft²63.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.20 | 17.84 |
| Displacement / Length | 269 | 248 |
| Comfort ratio | 26.7 | 27.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.92 | 1.89 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.3 |
C&C 37 vs Santana 37: the short version
- The C&C 37 and Santana 37 are close in length (37.6 ft11.45 m vs 37.7 ft11.48 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 37 carries the more powerful rig (18.2 vs 17.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Santana 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Santana 37 rates better for offshore work (1.89 vs 1.92).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.