C&C 37 vs Shannon 38
How do the C&C 37 and Shannon 38 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 37 | C&C 37 | Shannon 38 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.6 ft11.45 m | 37.8 ft11.51 m |
| Waterline length | 28.8 ft8.76 m | 29.2 ft8.89 m |
| Beam | 11.7 ft3.56 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Draft | 6.7 ft2.04 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 14,300 lb6,486 kg | 18,500 lb8,391 kg |
| Ballast | 6,000 lb2,722 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 670 ft²62.2 m² | 728 ft²67.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.20 | 16.65 |
| Displacement / Length | 269 | 333 |
| Comfort ratio | 26.7 | 34.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.92 | 1.74 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.2 |
C&C 37 vs Shannon 38: the short version
- The C&C 37 and Shannon 38 are close in length (37.6 ft11.45 m vs 37.8 ft11.51 m ).
- The Shannon 38 is heavier, displacing about 29% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 37 carries the more powerful rig (18.2 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Shannon 38 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Shannon 38 rates better for offshore work (1.74 vs 1.92).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.