C&C 44 vs Kalik 44
How do the C&C 44 and Kalik 44 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 44 | C&C 44 | Kalik 44 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 44.2 ft13.46 m | 44.0 ft13.41 m |
| Waterline length | 35.3 ft10.74 m | 37.1 ft11.30 m |
| Beam | 13.3 ft4.04 m | 13.8 ft4.19 m |
| Draft | 8.3 ft2.51 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 20,906 lb9,483 kg | 25,000 lb11,340 kg |
| Ballast | 9,850 lb4,468 kg | 10,600 lb4,808 kg |
| Sail area | 924 ft²85.8 m² | 913 ft²84.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.48 | 17.09 |
| Displacement / Length | 213 | 219 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.3 | 30.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.92 | 1.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.0 | 8.2 |
C&C 44 vs Kalik 44: the short version
- The C&C 44 and Kalik 44 are close in length (44.2 ft13.46 m vs 44.0 ft13.41 m ).
- The Kalik 44 is heavier, displacing about 20% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 44 carries the more powerful rig (19.5 vs 17.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Kalik 44 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Kalik 44 rates better for offshore work (1.88 vs 1.92).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.