C&C 44 vs Worldcruiser 44
How do the C&C 44 and Worldcruiser 44 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 44 | C&C 44 | Worldcruiser 44 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 44.2 ft13.46 m | 43.9 ft13.39 m |
| Waterline length | 35.3 ft10.74 m | 32.8 ft9.98 m |
| Beam | 13.3 ft4.04 m | 11.0 ft3.35 m |
| Draft | 8.3 ft2.51 m | 6.2 ft1.88 m |
| Displacement | 20,906 lb9,483 kg | 23,000 lb10,433 kg |
| Ballast | 9,850 lb4,468 kg | 8,500 lb3,856 kg |
| Sail area | 924 ft²85.8 m² | 1,011 ft²93.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.48 | 20.00 |
| Displacement / Length | 213 | 292 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.3 | 40.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.92 | 1.55 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.0 | 7.7 |
C&C 44 vs Worldcruiser 44: the short version
- The C&C 44 and Worldcruiser 44 are close in length (44.2 ft13.46 m vs 43.9 ft13.39 m ).
- The Worldcruiser 44 is heavier, displacing about 10% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Worldcruiser 44 carries the more powerful rig (20.0 vs 19.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Worldcruiser 44 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Worldcruiser 44 rates better for offshore work (1.55 vs 1.92).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.