C&C 45 vs Nonsuch 40
How do the C&C 45 and Nonsuch 40 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 45 | C&C 45 | Nonsuch 40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 45.3 ft13.79 m | 45.0 ft13.70 m |
| Waterline length | 39.1 ft11.91 m | 40.0 ft12.20 m |
| Beam | 13.8 ft4.19 m | 14.1 ft4.30 m |
| Draft | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 6.6 ft2.00 m |
| Displacement | 19,100 lb8,664 kg | 26,896 lb12,200 kg |
| Ballast | 9,800 lb4,445 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 1,107 ft²102.8 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 24.79 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 143 | 187 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.0 | 29.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 1.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.4 | 8.5 |
C&C 45 vs Nonsuch 40: the short version
- The C&C 45 and Nonsuch 40 are close in length (45.3 ft13.79 m vs 45.0 ft13.70 m ).
- The Nonsuch 40 is heavier, displacing about 41% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Nonsuch 40 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nonsuch 40 rates better for offshore work (1.88 vs 2.06).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.