C&C 51 Custom vs Swan 62
How do the C&C 51 Custom and Swan 62 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 51 Custom 
Swan 62 | C&C 51 Custom | Swan 62 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 51.8 ft15.77 m | 52.2 ft15.90 m |
| Waterline length | 43.9 ft13.39 m | 52.2 ft15.90 m |
| Beam | 13.6 ft4.14 m | 17.5 ft5.34 m |
| Draft | 9.9 ft3.02 m | 9.8 ft3.00 m |
| Displacement | 33,800 lb15,331 kg | 62,832 lb28,500 kg |
| Ballast | 13,800 lb6,260 kg | 24,692 lb11,200 kg |
| Sail area | 1,312 ft²121.9 m² | 2,392 ft²222.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.08 | 24.22 |
| Displacement / Length | 178 | 198 |
| Comfort ratio | 35.0 | 41.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.68 | 1.76 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.9 | 9.7 |
C&C 51 Custom vs Swan 62: the short version
- The C&C 51 Custom and Swan 62 are close in length (51.8 ft15.77 m vs 52.2 ft15.90 m ).
- The Swan 62 is heavier, displacing about 86% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 62 carries the more powerful rig (24.2 vs 20.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 62 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 51 Custom rates better for offshore work (1.68 vs 1.76).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.