C&C 61 vs C&C Custom 62
How do the C&C 61 and C&C Custom 62 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 61 
C&C Custom 62 | C&C 61 | C&C Custom 62 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 61.3 ft18.67 m | 62.1 ft18.93 m |
| Waterline length | 50.0 ft15.24 m | 52.8 ft16.09 m |
| Beam | 15.1 ft4.60 m | 15.2 ft4.63 m |
| Draft | 8.3 ft2.51 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 57,298 lb25,990 kg | 65,000 lb29,484 kg |
| Ballast | 22,178 lb10,060 kg | 26,000 lb11,793 kg |
| Sail area | 1,712 ft²159.1 m² | 1,593 ft²148.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.43 | 15.77 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 197 |
| Comfort ratio | 44.7 | 48.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.56 | 1.51 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 9.5 | 9.7 |
C&C 61 vs C&C Custom 62: the short version
- The C&C Custom 62 is the larger boat at 62.1 ft18.93 m LOA versus 61.3 ft18.67 m for the C&C 61.
- The C&C Custom 62 is heavier, displacing about 13% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 61 carries the more powerful rig (18.4 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C Custom 62 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C Custom 62 rates better for offshore work (1.51 vs 1.56).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.