C&C 99 vs Maxi 999
How do the C&C 99 and Maxi 999 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 99 
Maxi 999 | C&C 99 | Maxi 999 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.5 ft9.91 m | 32.5 ft9.91 m |
| Waterline length | 29.1 ft8.86 m | 26.9 ft8.20 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.30 m | 10.6 ft3.23 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 5.6 ft1.70 m |
| Displacement | 9,265 lb4,203 kg | 9,259 lb4,200 kg |
| Ballast | 3,500 lb1,588 kg | 3,307 lb1,500 kg |
| Sail area | 562 ft²52.2 m² | 635 ft²59.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.38 | 23.04 |
| Displacement / Length | 168 | 212 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.9 | 21.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 6.9 |
| Average used price | — | €37,000 |
C&C 99 vs Maxi 999: the short version
- The C&C 99 and Maxi 999 are close in length (32.5 ft9.91 m vs 32.5 ft9.91 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Maxi 999 carries the more powerful rig (23.0 vs 20.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Maxi 999 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Maxi 999 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.06).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.