C&C Custom 62 vs Swan 60OD
How do the C&C Custom 62 and Swan 60OD compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C Custom 62 
Swan 60OD | C&C Custom 62 | Swan 60OD | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 62.1 ft18.93 m | 61.9 ft18.86 m |
| Waterline length | 52.8 ft16.09 m | 54.8 ft16.70 m |
| Beam | 15.2 ft4.63 m | 16.7 ft5.09 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 11.8 ft3.60 m |
| Displacement | 65,000 lb29,484 kg | 42,990 lb19,500 kg |
| Ballast | 26,000 lb11,793 kg | 16,975 lb7,700 kg |
| Sail area | 1,593 ft²148.0 m² | 2,378 ft²220.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.77 | 31.00 |
| Displacement / Length | 197 | 117 |
| Comfort ratio | 48.2 | 27.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.51 | 1.91 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 9.7 | 9.9 |
C&C Custom 62 vs Swan 60OD: the short version
- The C&C Custom 62 and Swan 60OD are close in length (62.1 ft18.93 m vs 61.9 ft18.86 m ).
- The C&C Custom 62 is heavier, displacing about 51% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 60OD carries the more powerful rig (31.0 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C Custom 62 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C Custom 62 rates better for offshore work (1.51 vs 1.91).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.