C&C Custom 62 vs Swan 76
How do the C&C Custom 62 and Swan 76 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C Custom 62 
Swan 76 | C&C Custom 62 | Swan 76 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 62.1 ft18.93 m | 61.4 ft18.70 m |
| Waterline length | 52.8 ft16.09 m | 61.4 ft18.70 m |
| Beam | 15.2 ft4.63 m | 19.0 ft5.80 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 11.8 ft3.60 m |
| Displacement | 65,000 lb29,484 kg | 98,767 lb44,800 kg |
| Ballast | 26,000 lb11,793 kg | 24,000 lb10,886 kg |
| Sail area | 1,593 ft²148.0 m² | 2,449 ft²227.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.77 | 18.34 |
| Displacement / Length | 197 | 191 |
| Comfort ratio | 48.2 | 49.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.51 | 1.65 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 9.7 | 10.5 |
C&C Custom 62 vs Swan 76: the short version
- The C&C Custom 62 is the larger boat at 62.1 ft18.93 m LOA versus 61.4 ft18.70 m for the Swan 76.
- The Swan 76 is heavier, displacing about 52% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 76 carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 76 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C Custom 62 rates better for offshore work (1.51 vs 1.65).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.