C&C Custom 62 vs Swan 77
How do the C&C Custom 62 and Swan 77 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C Custom 62 
Swan 77 | C&C Custom 62 | Swan 77 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 62.1 ft18.93 m | 60.3 ft18.38 m |
| Waterline length | 52.8 ft16.09 m | 60.3 ft18.38 m |
| Beam | 15.2 ft4.63 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 11.2 ft3.40 m |
| Displacement | 65,000 lb29,484 kg | 112,436 lb51,000 kg |
| Ballast | 26,000 lb11,793 kg | 39,683 lb18,000 kg |
| Sail area | 1,593 ft²148.0 m² | 2,811 ft²261.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.77 | 19.31 |
| Displacement / Length | 197 | 229 |
| Comfort ratio | 48.2 | 54.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.51 | 1.63 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 9.7 | 10.4 |
C&C Custom 62 vs Swan 77: the short version
- The C&C Custom 62 is the larger boat at 62.1 ft18.93 m LOA versus 60.3 ft18.38 m for the Swan 77.
- The Swan 77 is heavier, displacing about 73% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 77 carries the more powerful rig (19.3 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 77 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C Custom 62 rates better for offshore work (1.51 vs 1.63).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.