C&C Custom 67 vs Nautor 105
How do the C&C Custom 67 and Nautor 105 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C Custom 67 
Nautor 105 | C&C Custom 67 | Nautor 105 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 73.0 ft22.25 m | 82.3 ft25.10 m |
| Waterline length | 58.0 ft17.68 m | 82.3 ft25.10 m |
| Beam | 18.3 ft5.59 m | 25.4 ft7.74 m |
| Draft | 10.5 ft3.20 m | 13.2 ft4.02 m |
| Displacement | 98,700 lb44,770 kg | 249,122 lb113,000 kg |
| Ballast | 35,274 lb16,000 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 2,860 ft²265.7 m² | 5,412 ft²502.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.43 | 21.87 |
| Displacement / Length | 226 | 199 |
| Comfort ratio | 50.8 | 63.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.59 | 1.61 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 10.2 | 12.2 |
C&C Custom 67 vs Nautor 105: the short version
- The Nautor 105 is the larger boat at 82.3 ft25.10 m LOA versus 73.0 ft22.25 m for the C&C Custom 67.
- The Nautor 105 is heavier, displacing about 152% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nautor 105 carries the more powerful rig (21.9 vs 21.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nautor 105 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C Custom 67 rates better for offshore work (1.59 vs 1.61).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.