C&C Custom 67 vs Swan 80 Mk II
How do the C&C Custom 67 and Swan 80 Mk II compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C Custom 67 
Swan 80 Mk II | C&C Custom 67 | Swan 80 Mk II | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 73.0 ft22.25 m | 72.8 ft22.19 m |
| Waterline length | 58.0 ft17.68 m | 72.8 ft22.19 m |
| Beam | 18.3 ft5.59 m | 19.9 ft6.08 m |
| Draft | 10.5 ft3.20 m | 13.1 ft4.00 m |
| Displacement | 98,700 lb44,770 kg | 79,146 lb35,900 kg |
| Ballast | 35,274 lb16,000 kg | 39,683 lb18,000 kg |
| Sail area | 2,860 ft²265.7 m² | 3,314 ft²307.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.43 | 28.76 |
| Displacement / Length | 226 | 92 |
| Comfort ratio | 50.8 | 31.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.59 | 1.86 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 10.2 | 11.4 |
C&C Custom 67 vs Swan 80 Mk II: the short version
- The C&C Custom 67 and Swan 80 Mk II are close in length (73.0 ft22.25 m vs 72.8 ft22.19 m ).
- The C&C Custom 67 is heavier, displacing about 25% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 80 Mk II carries the more powerful rig (28.8 vs 21.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C Custom 67 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C Custom 67 rates better for offshore work (1.59 vs 1.86).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.