C&C SR 27 vs ETAP 28
How do the C&C SR 27 and ETAP 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C SR 27 | C&C SR 27 | ETAP 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.5 ft8.38 m | 27.6 ft8.42 m |
| Waterline length | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 22.7 ft6.91 m |
| Beam | 9.5 ft2.90 m | 10.0 ft3.05 m |
| Draft | 5.2 ft1.59 m | 5.4 ft1.65 m |
| Displacement | 3,750 lb1,701 kg | 6,610 lb2,998 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 2,557 lb1,160 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 319 ft²29.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 14.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 121 | 253 |
| Comfort ratio | 11.5 | 19.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.45 | 2.13 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.4 |
C&C SR 27 vs ETAP 28: the short version
- The C&C SR 27 and ETAP 28 are close in length (27.5 ft8.38 m vs 27.6 ft8.42 m ).
- The ETAP 28 is heavier, displacing about 76% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The ETAP 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the ETAP 28 rates better for offshore work (2.13 vs 2.45).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.