CD1 D2 vs Dobbelman DB2 C
How do the CD1 D2 and Dobbelman DB2 C compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CD1 D2 | CD1 D2 | Dobbelman DB2 C | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.8 ft3.89 m | 12.8 ft3.89 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.2 ft0.68 m | 2.1 ft0.63 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 41 lb19 kg | 37 lb17 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.59 | 2.48 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
CD1 D2 vs Dobbelman DB2 C: the short version
- The CD1 D2 and Dobbelman DB2 C are close in length (12.8 ft3.89 m vs 12.8 ft3.89 m ).
- The CD1 D2 is heavier, displacing about 11% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Dobbelman DB2 C rates better for offshore work (2.48 vs 2.59).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.