CD1 D2 vs Dobbelman Piegelin PH1
How do the CD1 D2 and Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CD1 D2 | CD1 D2 | Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.8 ft3.89 m | 12.8 ft3.89 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.2 ft0.68 m | 2.1 ft0.64 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 41 lb19 kg | 37 lb17 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.59 | 2.52 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
CD1 D2 vs Dobbelman Piegelin PH1: the short version
- The CD1 D2 and Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 are close in length (12.8 ft3.89 m vs 12.8 ft3.89 m ).
- The CD1 D2 is heavier, displacing about 11% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Dobbelman Piegelin PH1 rates better for offshore work (2.52 vs 2.59).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.