CD1 D2 vs Reel 300
How do the CD1 D2 and Reel 300 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CD1 D2 | CD1 D2 | Reel 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.8 ft3.89 m | 12.7 ft3.88 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.2 ft0.68 m | 2.6 ft0.80 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 41 lb19 kg | 42 lb19 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.59 | 3.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
CD1 D2 vs Reel 300: the short version
- The CD1 D2 and Reel 300 are close in length (12.8 ft3.89 m vs 12.7 ft3.88 m ).
- By the capsize screening formula the CD1 D2 rates better for offshore work (2.59 vs 3.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.