CD1 D2 vs Reel Racer 340
How do the CD1 D2 and Reel Racer 340 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CD1 D2 | CD1 D2 | Reel Racer 340 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.8 ft3.89 m | 12.8 ft3.89 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.2 ft0.68 m | 2.6 ft0.80 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 41 lb19 kg | 42 lb19 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.59 | 3.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
CD1 D2 vs Reel Racer 340: the short version
- The CD1 D2 and Reel Racer 340 are close in length (12.8 ft3.89 m vs 12.8 ft3.89 m ).
- By the capsize screening formula the CD1 D2 rates better for offshore work (2.59 vs 3.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.