Challenger 24 vs Raven
How do the Challenger 24 and Raven compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Challenger 24 
Raven | Challenger 24 | Raven | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 24.3 ft7.39 m |
| Waterline length | 22.2 ft6.76 m | 21.6 ft6.58 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.49 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Draft | 3.4 ft1.04 m | 5.3 ft1.62 m |
| Displacement | 4,000 lb1,814 kg | 1,170 lb531 kg |
| Ballast | 2,090 lb948 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 253 ft²23.5 m² | 300 ft²27.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.06 | 43.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 164 | 52 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.5 | 6.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 2.66 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.2 |
Challenger 24 vs Raven: the short version
- The Challenger 24 and Raven are close in length (24.3 ft7.42 m vs 24.3 ft7.39 m ).
- The Challenger 24 is heavier, displacing about 242% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Raven carries the more powerful rig (43.2 vs 16.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Challenger 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Challenger 24 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.66).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.