Challenger 24 vs Sirius 26
How do the Challenger 24 and Sirius 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Challenger 24 
Sirius 26 | Challenger 24 | Sirius 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 24.4 ft7.44 m |
| Waterline length | 22.2 ft6.76 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.49 m | 9.4 ft2.87 m |
| Draft | 3.4 ft1.04 m | 3.2 ft0.97 m |
| Displacement | 4,000 lb1,814 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Ballast | 2,090 lb948 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 253 ft²23.5 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 16.06 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 164 | 189 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.5 | 15.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 2.28 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.3 |
Challenger 24 vs Sirius 26: the short version
- The Challenger 24 and Sirius 26 are close in length (24.3 ft7.42 m vs 24.4 ft7.44 m ).
- The Sirius 26 is heavier, displacing about 13% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Challenger 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Challenger 24 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.28).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.