Cheshire 14 vs Hunter 140
How do the Cheshire 14 and Hunter 140 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cheshire 14 Fiberglass Unlimited/Custom Fiberglass International · 1962 Hunter 140 Hunter Marine · 2003 | Cheshire 14 | Hunter 140 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 14.0 ft4.27 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 6.4 ft1.96 m | 5.8 ft1.78 m |
| Draft | 2.1 ft0.63 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 185 lb84 kg | 225 lb102 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 135 ft²12.5 m² | 102 ft²9.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 66.53 | 44.12 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 4.51 | 3.83 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Cheshire 14 vs Hunter 140: the short version
- The Cheshire 14 and Hunter 140 are close in length (14.0 ft4.27 m vs 14.0 ft4.27 m ).
- The Hunter 140 is heavier, displacing about 22% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cheshire 14 carries the more powerful rig (66.5 vs 44.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 140 rates better for offshore work (3.83 vs 4.51).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.