Cheshire 14 vs Lido 14
How do the Cheshire 14 and Lido 14 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cheshire 14 Fiberglass Unlimited/Custom Fiberglass International · 1962 
Lido 14 W. D. Schock Corp · 1958 | Cheshire 14 | Lido 14 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 14.0 ft4.27 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 13.8 ft4.19 m |
| Beam | 6.4 ft1.96 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Draft | 2.1 ft0.63 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 185 lb84 kg | 310 lb141 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 135 ft²12.5 m² | 111 ft²10.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 66.53 | 38.77 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 53 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 3.2 |
| Capsize screening | 4.51 | 3.55 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.0 |
Cheshire 14 vs Lido 14: the short version
- The Cheshire 14 and Lido 14 are close in length (14.0 ft4.27 m vs 14.0 ft4.27 m ).
- The Lido 14 is heavier, displacing about 68% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cheshire 14 carries the more powerful rig (66.5 vs 38.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Lido 14 rates better for offshore work (3.55 vs 4.51).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.