Chico vs Interclub Dinghy
How do the Chico and Interclub Dinghy compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Chico | Chico | Interclub Dinghy | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 11.8 ft3.60 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Draft | —— | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 176 lb80 kg | 150 lb68 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 62 ft²5.8 m² | 72 ft²6.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 31.59 | 40.81 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 44 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 2.7 |
| Capsize screening | 4.64 | 3.45 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 4.5 |
Chico vs Interclub Dinghy: the short version
- The Chico and Interclub Dinghy are close in length (11.8 ft3.60 m vs 11.5 ft3.51 m ).
- The Chico is heavier, displacing about 17% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Interclub Dinghy carries the more powerful rig (40.8 vs 31.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Interclub Dinghy rates better for offshore work (3.45 vs 4.64).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.