Chico vs Magnum Fun 350
How do the Chico and Magnum Fun 350 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Chico | Chico | Magnum Fun 350 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 11.8 ft3.60 m | 11.7 ft3.55 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 2.1 ft0.64 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 176 lb80 kg | 37 lb17 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 62 ft²5.8 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 31.59 | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 4.64 | 2.52 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Chico vs Magnum Fun 350: the short version
- The Chico and Magnum Fun 350 are close in length (11.8 ft3.60 m vs 11.7 ft3.55 m ).
- The Chico is heavier, displacing about 376% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Magnum Fun 350 rates better for offshore work (2.52 vs 4.64).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.