Chrysler 22 vs Etap 22
How do the Chrysler 22 and Etap 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Chrysler 22 | Chrysler 22 | Etap 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.6 ft6.58 m | 21.6 ft6.60 m |
| Waterline length | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 18.7 ft5.70 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 7.9 ft2.40 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 4.1 ft1.25 m |
| Displacement | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 2,756 lb1,250 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 1,213 lb550 kg |
| Sail area | 210 ft²19.5 m² | 215 ft²20.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.15 | 17.50 |
| Displacement / Length | 195 | 188 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.3 | 13.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.15 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Chrysler 22 vs Etap 22: the short version
- The Chrysler 22 and Etap 22 are close in length (21.6 ft6.58 m vs 21.6 ft6.60 m ).
- The Chrysler 22 is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 22 carries the more powerful rig (17.5 vs 16.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Chrysler 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Chrysler 22 rates better for offshore work (2.15 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.