Clipper 21 vs Hunter 212
How do the Clipper 21 and Hunter 212 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Clipper 21 | Clipper 21 | Hunter 212 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.9 ft6.36 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Waterline length | 16.7 ft5.08 m | 18.0 ft5.49 m |
| Beam | 7.3 ft2.21 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.32 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 1,800 lb816 kg | 1,800 lb816 kg |
| Ballast | 410 lb186 kg | 140 lb64 kg |
| Sail area | 192 ft²17.8 m² | 202 ft²18.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.76 | 21.84 |
| Displacement / Length | 173 | 138 |
| Comfort ratio | 11.1 | 7.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.38 | 3.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 5.7 |
Clipper 21 vs Hunter 212: the short version
- The Clipper 21 and Hunter 212 are close in length (20.9 ft6.36 m vs 21.0 ft6.40 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 212 carries the more powerful rig (21.8 vs 20.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Clipper 21 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Clipper 21 rates better for offshore work (2.38 vs 3.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.