Clipper 23 vs Com-Pac 23
How do the Clipper 23 and Com-Pac 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Clipper 23 | Clipper 23 | Com-Pac 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.7 ft6.91 m | 22.8 ft6.93 m |
| Waterline length | 18.8 ft5.71 m | 20.2 ft6.15 m |
| Beam | 7.7 ft2.34 m | 7.8 ft2.39 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 2.3 ft0.69 m |
| Displacement | 2,025 lb919 kg | 2,900 lb1,315 kg |
| Ballast | 500 lb227 kg | 1,340 lb608 kg |
| Sail area | 208 ft²19.3 m² | 206 ft²19.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.79 | 16.21 |
| Displacement / Length | 137 | 158 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.4 | 13.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.43 | 2.20 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 6.0 |
Clipper 23 vs Com-Pac 23: the short version
- The Clipper 23 and Com-Pac 23 are close in length (22.7 ft6.91 m vs 22.8 ft6.93 m ).
- The Com-Pac 23 is heavier, displacing about 43% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Clipper 23 carries the more powerful rig (20.8 vs 16.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Com-Pac 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-Pac 23 rates better for offshore work (2.20 vs 2.43).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.