ClubSwan 42 vs ClubSwan 50
How do the ClubSwan 42 and ClubSwan 50 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 42 
ClubSwan 50 | ClubSwan 42 | ClubSwan 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 54.9 ft16.74 m |
| Waterline length | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 45.9 ft14.00 m |
| Beam | 12.9 ft3.93 m | 13.8 ft4.20 m |
| Draft | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 11.5 ft3.50 m |
| Displacement | 16,865 lb7,650 kg | 18,739 lb8,500 kg |
| Ballast | 7,046 lb3,196 kg | 7,605 lb3,450 kg |
| Sail area | 1,176 ft²109.3 m² | 1,700 ft²157.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 28.61 | 38.55 |
| Displacement / Length | 148 | 86 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.4 | 18.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 2.08 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.2 | 9.1 |
ClubSwan 42 vs ClubSwan 50: the short version
- The ClubSwan 50 is the larger boat at 54.9 ft16.74 m LOA versus 37.0 ft11.29 m for the ClubSwan 42.
- The ClubSwan 50 is heavier, displacing about 11% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 50 carries the more powerful rig (38.6 vs 28.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The ClubSwan 42 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the ClubSwan 42 rates better for offshore work (2.01 vs 2.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.