ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 115
How do the ClubSwan 42 and Swan 115 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 42 
Swan 115 | ClubSwan 42 | Swan 115 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 107.7 ft32.84 m |
| Waterline length | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 107.7 ft32.84 m |
| Beam | 12.9 ft3.93 m | 26.6 ft8.12 m |
| Draft | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 11.5 ft3.50 m |
| Displacement | 16,865 lb7,650 kg | 203,928 lb92,500 kg |
| Ballast | 7,046 lb3,196 kg | 70,547 lb32,000 kg |
| Sail area | 1,176 ft²109.3 m² | 7,025 ft²652.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 28.61 | 32.44 |
| Displacement / Length | 148 | 73 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.4 | 37.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 1.81 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.2 | 13.9 |
ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 115: the short version
- The Swan 115 is the larger boat at 107.7 ft32.84 m LOA versus 37.0 ft11.29 m for the ClubSwan 42.
- The Swan 115 is heavier, displacing about 1109% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 115 carries the more powerful rig (32.4 vs 28.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 115 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 115 rates better for offshore work (1.81 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.