ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 40 Frers
How do the ClubSwan 42 and Swan 40 Frers compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 42 
Swan 40 Frers | ClubSwan 42 | Swan 40 Frers | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 32.4 ft9.88 m |
| Waterline length | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 32.4 ft9.88 m |
| Beam | 12.9 ft3.93 m | 12.9 ft3.94 m |
| Draft | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 7.0 ft2.15 m |
| Displacement | 16,865 lb7,650 kg | 19,401 lb8,800 kg |
| Ballast | 7,046 lb3,196 kg | 6,990 lb3,171 kg |
| Sail area | 1,176 ft²109.3 m² | 830 ft²77.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 28.61 | 18.39 |
| Displacement / Length | 148 | 254 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.4 | 30.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.2 | 7.6 |
ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 40 Frers: the short version
- The ClubSwan 42 is the larger boat at 37.0 ft11.29 m LOA versus 32.4 ft9.88 m for the Swan 40 Frers.
- The Swan 40 Frers is heavier, displacing about 15% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 42 carries the more powerful rig (28.6 vs 18.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 40 Frers scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 40 Frers rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.