ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 431
How do the ClubSwan 42 and Swan 431 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 42 
Swan 431 | ClubSwan 42 | Swan 431 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 33.3 ft10.16 m |
| Waterline length | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 33.3 ft10.16 m |
| Beam | 12.9 ft3.93 m | 13.4 ft4.09 m |
| Draft | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 7.5 ft2.30 m |
| Displacement | 16,865 lb7,650 kg | 27,558 lb12,500 kg |
| Ballast | 7,046 lb3,196 kg | 11,900 lb5,398 kg |
| Sail area | 1,176 ft²109.3 m² | 896 ft²83.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 28.61 | 15.71 |
| Displacement / Length | 148 | 332 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.4 | 40.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 1.78 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.2 | 7.7 |
ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 431: the short version
- The ClubSwan 42 is the larger boat at 37.0 ft11.29 m LOA versus 33.3 ft10.16 m for the Swan 431.
- The Swan 431 is heavier, displacing about 63% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 42 carries the more powerful rig (28.6 vs 15.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 431 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 431 rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.