ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 55 Frers
How do the ClubSwan 42 and Swan 55 Frers compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 42 
Swan 55 Frers | ClubSwan 42 | Swan 55 Frers | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 42.9 ft13.07 m |
| Waterline length | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 42.9 ft13.07 m |
| Beam | 12.9 ft3.93 m | 15.9 ft4.85 m |
| Draft | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 8.5 ft2.60 m |
| Displacement | 16,865 lb7,650 kg | 52,029 lb23,600 kg |
| Ballast | 7,046 lb3,196 kg | 19,900 lb9,026 kg |
| Sail area | 1,176 ft²109.3 m² | 1,147 ft²106.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 28.61 | 13.17 |
| Displacement / Length | 148 | 295 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.4 | 47.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 1.70 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.2 | 8.8 |
ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 55 Frers: the short version
- The Swan 55 Frers is the larger boat at 42.9 ft13.07 m LOA versus 37.0 ft11.29 m for the ClubSwan 42.
- The Swan 55 Frers is heavier, displacing about 209% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 42 carries the more powerful rig (28.6 vs 13.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 55 Frers scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 55 Frers rates better for offshore work (1.70 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.