ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 61
How do the ClubSwan 42 and Swan 61 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 42 
Swan 61 | ClubSwan 42 | Swan 61 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 48.2 ft14.68 m |
| Waterline length | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 48.2 ft14.68 m |
| Beam | 12.9 ft3.93 m | 16.4 ft5.00 m |
| Draft | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 10.2 ft3.10 m |
| Displacement | 16,865 lb7,650 kg | 61,068 lb27,700 kg |
| Ballast | 7,046 lb3,196 kg | 20,300 lb9,208 kg |
| Sail area | 1,176 ft²109.3 m² | 1,656 ft²153.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 28.61 | 17.09 |
| Displacement / Length | 148 | 244 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.4 | 47.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 1.67 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.2 | 9.3 |
ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 61: the short version
- The Swan 61 is the larger boat at 48.2 ft14.68 m LOA versus 37.0 ft11.29 m for the ClubSwan 42.
- The Swan 61 is heavier, displacing about 262% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 42 carries the more powerful rig (28.6 vs 17.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 61 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 61 rates better for offshore work (1.67 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.