ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 651
How do the ClubSwan 42 and Swan 651 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 42 
Swan 651 | ClubSwan 42 | Swan 651 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 55.1 ft16.80 m |
| Waterline length | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 55.1 ft16.80 m |
| Beam | 12.9 ft3.93 m | 17.4 ft5.30 m |
| Draft | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 11.5 ft3.50 m |
| Displacement | 16,865 lb7,650 kg | 79,366 lb36,000 kg |
| Ballast | 7,046 lb3,196 kg | 31,700 lb14,379 kg |
| Sail area | 1,176 ft²109.3 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 28.61 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 148 | 212 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.4 | 49.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 1.62 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.2 | 9.9 |
ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 651: the short version
- The Swan 651 is the larger boat at 55.1 ft16.80 m LOA versus 37.0 ft11.29 m for the ClubSwan 42.
- The Swan 651 is heavier, displacing about 371% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 651 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 651 rates better for offshore work (1.62 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.