ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 68
How do the ClubSwan 42 and Swan 68 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 42 
Swan 68 | ClubSwan 42 | Swan 68 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 54.7 ft16.68 m |
| Waterline length | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 54.7 ft16.68 m |
| Beam | 12.9 ft3.93 m | 17.8 ft5.42 m |
| Draft | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 11.7 ft3.56 m |
| Displacement | 16,865 lb7,650 kg | 88,185 lb40,000 kg |
| Ballast | 7,046 lb3,196 kg | 35,274 lb16,000 kg |
| Sail area | 1,176 ft²109.3 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 28.61 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 148 | 240 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.4 | 53.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 1.60 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.2 | 9.9 |
ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 68: the short version
- The Swan 68 is the larger boat at 54.7 ft16.68 m LOA versus 37.0 ft11.29 m for the ClubSwan 42.
- The Swan 68 is heavier, displacing about 423% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 68 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 68 rates better for offshore work (1.60 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.