ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 76
How do the ClubSwan 42 and Swan 76 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 42 
Swan 76 | ClubSwan 42 | Swan 76 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 61.4 ft18.70 m |
| Waterline length | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 61.4 ft18.70 m |
| Beam | 12.9 ft3.93 m | 19.0 ft5.80 m |
| Draft | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 11.8 ft3.60 m |
| Displacement | 16,865 lb7,650 kg | 98,767 lb44,800 kg |
| Ballast | 7,046 lb3,196 kg | 24,000 lb10,886 kg |
| Sail area | 1,176 ft²109.3 m² | 2,449 ft²227.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 28.61 | 18.34 |
| Displacement / Length | 148 | 191 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.4 | 49.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 1.65 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.2 | 10.5 |
ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 76: the short version
- The Swan 76 is the larger boat at 61.4 ft18.70 m LOA versus 37.0 ft11.29 m for the ClubSwan 42.
- The Swan 76 is heavier, displacing about 486% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 42 carries the more powerful rig (28.6 vs 18.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 76 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 76 rates better for offshore work (1.65 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.