ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 80
How do the ClubSwan 42 and Swan 80 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 42 
Swan 80 | ClubSwan 42 | Swan 80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 69.3 ft21.12 m |
| Waterline length | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 69.3 ft21.12 m |
| Beam | 12.9 ft3.93 m | 19.1 ft5.82 m |
| Draft | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 13.8 ft4.20 m |
| Displacement | 16,865 lb7,650 kg | 80,910 lb36,700 kg |
| Ballast | 7,046 lb3,196 kg | 33,100 lb15,014 kg |
| Sail area | 1,176 ft²109.3 m² | 3,324 ft²308.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 28.61 | 28.43 |
| Displacement / Length | 148 | 109 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.4 | 35.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 1.77 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.2 | 11.2 |
ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 80: the short version
- The Swan 80 is the larger boat at 69.3 ft21.12 m LOA versus 37.0 ft11.29 m for the ClubSwan 42.
- The Swan 80 is heavier, displacing about 380% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 42 carries the more powerful rig (28.6 vs 28.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 80 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 80 rates better for offshore work (1.77 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.