ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 82
How do the ClubSwan 42 and Swan 82 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 42 
Swan 82 | ClubSwan 42 | Swan 82 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 69.8 ft21.26 m |
| Waterline length | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 69.8 ft21.26 m |
| Beam | 12.9 ft3.93 m | 19.2 ft5.86 m |
| Draft | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 12.4 ft3.78 m |
| Displacement | 16,865 lb7,650 kg | 83,776 lb38,000 kg |
| Ballast | 7,046 lb3,196 kg | 29,300 lb13,290 kg |
| Sail area | 1,176 ft²109.3 m² | 3,474 ft²322.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 28.61 | 29.03 |
| Displacement / Length | 148 | 110 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.4 | 36.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 1.76 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.2 | 11.2 |
ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 82: the short version
- The Swan 82 is the larger boat at 69.8 ft21.26 m LOA versus 37.0 ft11.29 m for the ClubSwan 42.
- The Swan 82 is heavier, displacing about 397% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 82 carries the more powerful rig (29.0 vs 28.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 82 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 82 rates better for offshore work (1.76 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.