ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 40 Frers
How do the ClubSwan 50 and Swan 40 Frers compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 50 | ClubSwan 50 | Swan 40 Frers | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 54.9 ft16.74 m | 32.4 ft9.88 m |
| Waterline length | 45.9 ft14.00 m | 32.4 ft9.88 m |
| Beam | 13.8 ft4.20 m | 12.9 ft3.94 m |
| Draft | 11.5 ft3.50 m | 7.0 ft2.15 m |
| Displacement | 18,739 lb8,500 kg | 19,401 lb8,800 kg |
| Ballast | 7,605 lb3,450 kg | 6,990 lb3,171 kg |
| Sail area | 1,700 ft²157.9 m² | 830 ft²77.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 38.55 | 18.39 |
| Displacement / Length | 86 | 254 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 30.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.08 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 9.1 | 7.6 |
ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 40 Frers: the short version
- The ClubSwan 50 is the larger boat at 54.9 ft16.74 m LOA versus 32.4 ft9.88 m for the Swan 40 Frers.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 50 carries the more powerful rig (38.6 vs 18.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 40 Frers scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 40 Frers rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 2.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.