ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 41
How do the ClubSwan 50 and Swan 41 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 50 | ClubSwan 50 | Swan 41 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 54.9 ft16.74 m | 30.3 ft9.22 m |
| Waterline length | 45.9 ft14.00 m | 30.3 ft9.22 m |
| Beam | 13.8 ft4.20 m | 11.9 ft3.64 m |
| Draft | 11.5 ft3.50 m | 6.9 ft2.10 m |
| Displacement | 18,739 lb8,500 kg | 23,810 lb10,800 kg |
| Ballast | 7,605 lb3,450 kg | 9,700 lb4,400 kg |
| Sail area | 1,700 ft²157.9 m² | 794 ft²73.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 38.55 | 15.35 |
| Displacement / Length | 86 | 384 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 44.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.08 | 1.66 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 9.1 | 7.4 |
ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 41: the short version
- The ClubSwan 50 is the larger boat at 54.9 ft16.74 m LOA versus 30.3 ft9.22 m for the Swan 41.
- The Swan 41 is heavier, displacing about 27% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 50 carries the more powerful rig (38.6 vs 15.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 41 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 41 rates better for offshore work (1.66 vs 2.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.