ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 46 Mk II
How do the ClubSwan 50 and Swan 46 Mk II compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 50 | ClubSwan 50 | Swan 46 Mk II | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 54.9 ft16.74 m | 37.9 ft11.55 m |
| Waterline length | 45.9 ft14.00 m | 37.9 ft11.55 m |
| Beam | 13.8 ft4.20 m | 14.5 ft4.41 m |
| Draft | 11.5 ft3.50 m | 8.9 ft2.70 m |
| Displacement | 18,739 lb8,500 kg | 31,306 lb14,200 kg |
| Ballast | 7,605 lb3,450 kg | 11,400 lb5,171 kg |
| Sail area | 1,700 ft²157.9 m² | 978 ft²90.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 38.55 | 15.75 |
| Displacement / Length | 86 | 257 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 36.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.08 | 1.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 9.1 | 8.2 |
ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 46 Mk II: the short version
- The ClubSwan 50 is the larger boat at 54.9 ft16.74 m LOA versus 37.9 ft11.55 m for the Swan 46 Mk II.
- The Swan 46 Mk II is heavier, displacing about 67% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 50 carries the more powerful rig (38.6 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 46 Mk II scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 46 Mk II rates better for offshore work (1.84 vs 2.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.