ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 46 Mk III
How do the ClubSwan 50 and Swan 46 Mk III compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 50 
Swan 46 Mk III | ClubSwan 50 | Swan 46 Mk III | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 54.9 ft16.74 m | 46.6 ft14.20 m |
| Waterline length | 45.9 ft14.00 m | 39.6 ft12.06 m |
| Beam | 13.8 ft4.20 m | 14.0 ft4.26 m |
| Draft | 11.5 ft3.50 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Displacement | 18,739 lb8,500 kg | 32,408 lb14,700 kg |
| Ballast | 7,605 lb3,450 kg | 12,125 lb5,500 kg |
| Sail area | 1,700 ft²157.9 m² | 1,179 ft²109.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 38.55 | 18.56 |
| Displacement / Length | 86 | 234 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 35.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.08 | 1.75 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 9.1 | 8.4 |
ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 46 Mk III: the short version
- The ClubSwan 50 is the larger boat at 54.9 ft16.74 m LOA versus 46.6 ft14.20 m for the Swan 46 Mk III.
- The Swan 46 Mk III is heavier, displacing about 73% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 50 carries the more powerful rig (38.6 vs 18.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 46 Mk III scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 46 Mk III rates better for offshore work (1.75 vs 2.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.