ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 47
How do the ClubSwan 50 and Swan 47 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 50 | ClubSwan 50 | Swan 47 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 54.9 ft16.74 m | 36.3 ft11.05 m |
| Waterline length | 45.9 ft14.00 m | 36.3 ft11.05 m |
| Beam | 13.8 ft4.20 m | 13.8 ft4.19 m |
| Draft | 11.5 ft3.50 m | 7.6 ft2.33 m |
| Displacement | 18,739 lb8,500 kg | 32,408 lb14,700 kg |
| Ballast | 7,605 lb3,450 kg | 15,500 lb7,031 kg |
| Sail area | 1,700 ft²157.9 m² | 1,366 ft²126.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 38.55 | 21.50 |
| Displacement / Length | 86 | 304 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 42.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.08 | 1.73 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 9.1 | 8.1 |
ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 47: the short version
- The ClubSwan 50 is the larger boat at 54.9 ft16.74 m LOA versus 36.3 ft11.05 m for the Swan 47.
- The Swan 47 is heavier, displacing about 73% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 50 carries the more powerful rig (38.6 vs 21.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 47 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 47 rates better for offshore work (1.73 vs 2.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.