ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 55 Frers
How do the ClubSwan 50 and Swan 55 Frers compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 50 | ClubSwan 50 | Swan 55 Frers | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 54.9 ft16.74 m | 42.9 ft13.07 m |
| Waterline length | 45.9 ft14.00 m | 42.9 ft13.07 m |
| Beam | 13.8 ft4.20 m | 15.9 ft4.85 m |
| Draft | 11.5 ft3.50 m | 8.5 ft2.60 m |
| Displacement | 18,739 lb8,500 kg | 52,029 lb23,600 kg |
| Ballast | 7,605 lb3,450 kg | 19,900 lb9,026 kg |
| Sail area | 1,700 ft²157.9 m² | 1,147 ft²106.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 38.55 | 13.17 |
| Displacement / Length | 86 | 295 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 47.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.08 | 1.70 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 9.1 | 8.8 |
ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 55 Frers: the short version
- The ClubSwan 50 is the larger boat at 54.9 ft16.74 m LOA versus 42.9 ft13.07 m for the Swan 55 Frers.
- The Swan 55 Frers is heavier, displacing about 178% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 50 carries the more powerful rig (38.6 vs 13.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 55 Frers scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 55 Frers rates better for offshore work (1.70 vs 2.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.