ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 57 Mk II
How do the ClubSwan 50 and Swan 57 Mk II compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 50 | ClubSwan 50 | Swan 57 Mk II | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 54.9 ft16.74 m | 44.5 ft13.57 m |
| Waterline length | 45.9 ft14.00 m | 44.5 ft13.57 m |
| Beam | 13.8 ft4.20 m | 15.9 ft4.85 m |
| Draft | 11.5 ft3.50 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Displacement | 18,739 lb8,500 kg | 54,013 lb24,500 kg |
| Ballast | 7,605 lb3,450 kg | 20,348 lb9,230 kg |
| Sail area | 1,700 ft²157.9 m² | 1,350 ft²125.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 38.55 | 15.12 |
| Displacement / Length | 86 | 273 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 47.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.08 | 1.68 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 9.1 | 8.9 |
ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 57 Mk II: the short version
- The ClubSwan 50 is the larger boat at 54.9 ft16.74 m LOA versus 44.5 ft13.57 m for the Swan 57 Mk II.
- The Swan 57 Mk II is heavier, displacing about 188% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 50 carries the more powerful rig (38.6 vs 15.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 57 Mk II scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 57 Mk II rates better for offshore work (1.68 vs 2.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.