ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 68
How do the ClubSwan 50 and Swan 68 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 50 | ClubSwan 50 | Swan 68 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 54.9 ft16.74 m | 54.7 ft16.68 m |
| Waterline length | 45.9 ft14.00 m | 54.7 ft16.68 m |
| Beam | 13.8 ft4.20 m | 17.8 ft5.42 m |
| Draft | 11.5 ft3.50 m | 11.7 ft3.56 m |
| Displacement | 18,739 lb8,500 kg | 88,185 lb40,000 kg |
| Ballast | 7,605 lb3,450 kg | 35,274 lb16,000 kg |
| Sail area | 1,700 ft²157.9 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 38.55 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 86 | 240 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 53.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.08 | 1.60 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 9.1 | 9.9 |
ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 68: the short version
- The ClubSwan 50 and Swan 68 are close in length (54.9 ft16.74 m vs 54.7 ft16.68 m ).
- The Swan 68 is heavier, displacing about 371% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 68 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 68 rates better for offshore work (1.60 vs 2.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.