ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 76
How do the ClubSwan 50 and Swan 76 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 50 | ClubSwan 50 | Swan 76 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 54.9 ft16.74 m | 61.4 ft18.70 m |
| Waterline length | 45.9 ft14.00 m | 61.4 ft18.70 m |
| Beam | 13.8 ft4.20 m | 19.0 ft5.80 m |
| Draft | 11.5 ft3.50 m | 11.8 ft3.60 m |
| Displacement | 18,739 lb8,500 kg | 98,767 lb44,800 kg |
| Ballast | 7,605 lb3,450 kg | 24,000 lb10,886 kg |
| Sail area | 1,700 ft²157.9 m² | 2,449 ft²227.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 38.55 | 18.34 |
| Displacement / Length | 86 | 191 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 49.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.08 | 1.65 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 9.1 | 10.5 |
ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 76: the short version
- The Swan 76 is the larger boat at 61.4 ft18.70 m LOA versus 54.9 ft16.74 m for the ClubSwan 50.
- The Swan 76 is heavier, displacing about 427% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 50 carries the more powerful rig (38.6 vs 18.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 76 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 76 rates better for offshore work (1.65 vs 2.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.