ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 80 Mk II
How do the ClubSwan 50 and Swan 80 Mk II compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 50 | ClubSwan 50 | Swan 80 Mk II | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 54.9 ft16.74 m | 72.8 ft22.19 m |
| Waterline length | 45.9 ft14.00 m | 72.8 ft22.19 m |
| Beam | 13.8 ft4.20 m | 19.9 ft6.08 m |
| Draft | 11.5 ft3.50 m | 13.1 ft4.00 m |
| Displacement | 18,739 lb8,500 kg | 79,146 lb35,900 kg |
| Ballast | 7,605 lb3,450 kg | 39,683 lb18,000 kg |
| Sail area | 1,700 ft²157.9 m² | 3,314 ft²307.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 38.55 | 28.76 |
| Displacement / Length | 86 | 92 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 31.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.08 | 1.86 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 9.1 | 11.4 |
ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 80 Mk II: the short version
- The Swan 80 Mk II is the larger boat at 72.8 ft22.19 m LOA versus 54.9 ft16.74 m for the ClubSwan 50.
- The Swan 80 Mk II is heavier, displacing about 322% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 50 carries the more powerful rig (38.6 vs 28.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 80 Mk II scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 80 Mk II rates better for offshore work (1.86 vs 2.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.