Coast 34 vs Hunter 34
How do the Coast 34 and Hunter 34 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Coast 34 
Hunter 34 | Coast 34 | Hunter 34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.3 ft10.46 m | 34.4 ft10.49 m |
| Waterline length | 28.7 ft8.74 m | 28.3 ft8.61 m |
| Beam | 11.5 ft3.50 m | 11.6 ft3.53 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 15,750 lb7,144 kg | 11,820 lb5,361 kg |
| Ballast | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 5,000 lb2,268 kg |
| Sail area | 625 ft²58.1 m² | 567 ft²52.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.92 | 17.48 |
| Displacement / Length | 298 | 234 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.1 | 23.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.83 | 2.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.1 |
Coast 34 vs Hunter 34: the short version
- The Coast 34 and Hunter 34 are close in length (34.3 ft10.46 m vs 34.4 ft10.49 m ).
- The Coast 34 is heavier, displacing about 33% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 34 carries the more powerful rig (17.5 vs 15.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Coast 34 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Coast 34 rates better for offshore work (1.83 vs 2.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.