Coast 34 vs Hunter 356
How do the Coast 34 and Hunter 356 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Coast 34 
Hunter 356 | Coast 34 | Hunter 356 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.3 ft10.46 m | 34.5 ft10.52 m |
| Waterline length | 28.7 ft8.74 m | 30.6 ft9.32 m |
| Beam | 11.5 ft3.50 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 6.4 ft1.96 m |
| Displacement | 15,750 lb7,144 kg | 13,900 lb6,305 kg |
| Ballast | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Sail area | 625 ft²58.1 m² | 632 ft²58.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.92 | 17.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 298 | 217 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.1 | 24.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.83 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.4 |
Coast 34 vs Hunter 356: the short version
- The Coast 34 and Hunter 356 are close in length (34.3 ft10.46 m vs 34.5 ft10.52 m ).
- The Coast 34 is heavier, displacing about 13% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 356 carries the more powerful rig (17.5 vs 15.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Coast 34 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Coast 34 rates better for offshore work (1.83 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.